The official blog of American Veteran Magazine, the national quarterly publication of AMVETS.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

AMVETS Speaks with President Obama on Third-Party Billing


On Monday afternoon, AMVETS Executive Director Jim King had the opportunity to meet with President Barack Obama and leaders from the nation's leading veterans' service organizations to discuss the controversial third-party billing proposal for service-connected veterans.

AMVETS was encouraged by the President's commitment to not implement the new policy outright, should it have negative effects on veterans. However, Obama and the White House staff would not entirely rule out a policy change, and asked for help from veterans' leadership to come up with alternative proposals to fund the VA internally.

On the surface, the proposal seems to be a reasonable way from the VA to bring in extra income, since the White House has assured the veterans' community that the VA would not directly bill veterans for any service-connected medical services. However, when the cost is passed along to a third-party insurance company, AMVETS is concerned that the proposal could have serious unintended consequences for veterans, making many uninsurable in the private sector.

King said that veterans would quickly reach their third-party caps for health care within a few short visits to treat service-connected conditions. Veterans could also face drastic increases in premiums, or lose third-party coverage altogether, since they will become a greater liability for private insurance companies. The proposal could also have detrimental effects on veteran employers and business owners, driving up the costs of health care for veteran-friendly businesses.

King suggested to the White House that the VA step up its current third-party billing for non-service-connected conditions to help recoup some vital income. On Thursday, AMVETS legislative team will have the opportunity to present White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel with alternatives to the third-party billing proposal.

AMVETS remains vehemently opposed to the controversial policy, and AMVETS' leaders will continue to work with the White House and the VA to ensure that it does not become a reality. During recent testimony on Capitol Hill, AMVETS Legislative Director Ray Kelley and the Independent Budget partners voiced their fervent opposition to the proposal. Their concerns resonated with both Congressional committees on veterans' affairs, as both committee chairmen, Sen. Daniel Akaka and Rep. Bob Filner, indicated that they would not approve a VA budget proposal that included third-party billing for service-connected veterans.

American Veteran magazine will be following this story closely. Check back regularly with the blog for updates.

-Ryan

(Photo: President Barack Obama visits with troops at the Pentagon in January for the first time as Commander-in-Chief. DoD photo by MC1 Chad J. McNeeley, released.)

3 comments:

  1. We need to make sure that this will not harm the more severely disabled vets. There are many times that the VA already collects from my insurance company and I am a 100% rated. I don't really object to medical reimbursements to the VA if the VA knows how to do it. This country is running out of money and I have already seen the significant decline of VA health care due to its increased use and especially with those who get treated for non-service problems. Right now it does a terrible job in collecting reimbursements. A few pay but most don't. I pay a heavy premium for my family's health care insurance and I seldom if ever use it. I use the VA which is no doubt much better than private health providers and also specialized in the unique medical problems of vets. There are hard times for many people but the veteran has an entitlement because of his service. The Obama administration seems hell bent to give services to large groups of people who have done nothing for this country. In the end the veteran benefits are being widdled down to parity with those who did not pay the price.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amen, Jim you said it all, I'm behind you 160%

    ReplyDelete
  3. It was a great blog i had ever read.Thanks for sharing the blog, seems to be interesting and informative too.Could you help me finfing more detail regarding Online Third Party Insurance

    ReplyDelete